Cross posted from MoviePass:
During the AMC Theatres presentation of "The Dark Knight Trilogy", my friends and I took a quick trip to the nearest gas station, as my head was killing me and I needed some tylenol. In the car, one of them asked a pretty random question, regarding my relationship with god. I could've made a joke about him getting ready to kidnap us, but I decided to answer honestly; "I'm not christian, I'm just Bill."
Who are we, where are we going and what is the point of it all? Boiled down, my belief (I prefer idea) is that we have barely scratched the surface with understanding THIS reality - how can we possibly understand OTHER ones? Honestly, I feel more comfortable explaining myself in movie form. If you care to, check out "Groundhog Day", "Defending Your Life" and, now playing across the country, "Cloud Atlas".
Not sure about watching that last one? Think of it as "Magnolia" - one large story made up of multiple tales - but on an epic scale. Think of it as several different movies (a comedy, a sci fi thriller, a period piece, a drama, etc) told forward and sideways, bleeding into one another and making one massive film. Think of it as having the ambition of a D.W. Griffith or Abel Gance picture. Think of it as maybe...well, having to think afterwards. You still want to shell out money for that Rob Cohen "movie"?
It's amazing to me that such a chance could be taken on such an incredible story. Hollywood didn't have much faith in it, so the filmmakers had to go and raise the funds themselves! Making a movie in this manner, based on a book deemed unfilmmable, is either a sign of madness or courage. Perhaps both.
Some of the madness does show up on screen. We see Hugh Grant in warrior paint as some future scape headhunter, Tom Hanks as a bald British gangster/author and an Asian Hugo Weaving. At some point during production, I bet hesitation was felt by the producers.
But, all of the courage shows up as well. We get a wonderfully heartbreaking romance between two young men, a woman in the role of a messiah, a new language spoken, a lengthy duration and, most important, questions planted into the minds of the audience. At some point during production, I bet a sense of pride was felt by the crew.
Some people are dubbing this as some kind of a bomb, having cost so much, and making so little thus far. Some people are dubbing this as pretentious rubbish, and the worst thing everyone involved could've been part of. I will respond with one quote from the film:
When told that there is an order to the world, and that any attempts to shake it would just be a drop in an ocean, a character responds "What is an ocean but a multitude of drops?" This was probably made knowing that it wouldn't make much money, and with the hope that it will give pause to people who watch it.
The friend who asked me about god is an atheist. I'm still just Bill. To me, the universe is one long movie, made up of smaller storylines, leading to one big finish. It might not be presented in the most consumable of ways, it might shift in tone and it might be ridiculous at times, but trust me; it's all important, and it'll all make sense in the end.
5/5 *'s
Showing posts with label past. Show all posts
Showing posts with label past. Show all posts
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Review: "Cloud Atlas"
Labels:
2012,
Al Brooks,
ambitious,
Bill Murray,
blog,
cinema,
Cloud Atlas,
dark knight,
epic,
film,
film critic,
future,
god,
movie,
movie review,
new orleans,
past,
sci fi,
universe,
Wachowski
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Review: "Looper"
What I'm about to describe is one of the creepiest scenes I've witnessed at the movies this year:
In order to bring a man from the future out of hiding, a mafia syndicate captures his present self, and slowly tortures him. First, a message appears carved into the future man's arm, telling him to meet at a specific place and time. Then, fingers go missing. Soon, his tongue is gone. His feet next. Eventually, he is crawling to the location, where he is then executed. The present self is on a hospital bed, with blood everywhere.
For me, it isn't the fact that the future self wasted away in moments that I find frightening; it's that the present self must still live his life - dismembered and broken - for these events to happen.
Time travel as a weapon. Did you really think we'd use it for anything else?
"Looper" may not officially be a horror film, but it features some scary sequences and themes, as good sci fi should. It is mostly set in 2042 Kansas, where it appears that gangland violence and poverty have only gotten worse - at least we finally get hovering motorcycles. We follow Joe, a gangster known as a looper; someone who eliminates targets sent from the mob of the future, to his present. When his newest target - his future self - escapes, Joe gets in trouble with his boss, and must hunt himself to make things right. But, is it as simple as that?
With time travel, nothing is "simple". You see, there's the "12 Monkeys" (time cannot be changed) way of presenting time travel, and the "Back to the Future" (time can be changed, and multiple possibilities exist) method. "Looper" kind of has a variation closer to - believe it or not - "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure". In that movie, characters will tell themselves to go back in time and grab an object, and BOOM - the object appears in their hand, negating the need to go back in time. While that scenario doesn't play out in our story, similar paradoxical situations are offered. If you're not careful, your egg could fry like a brain.
The arc(s) of Joe (both of them) and how it is presented may be the best aspect of the story. There's a beautiful symmetry of personality happening here, as the two versions of the same man occupy the same space and time, and a wonderful irony when we see how the conflicts change both the present and future selves. A nomination for best screenplay is not out of the question, I say.
If given the opportunity, would you kill child Hitler in order to prevent atrocities? What if you fail, and end up being the reason for the creation of the monster you tried to destroy? Could you live with that? Could you stop that? Can the chain be broken and the loop cut? I thought about this on the ride home after the screening.
It's chaotic, it's dark, and it's what I want out of sci fi. Characters are forced to make impossible choices in an almost impossible to grasp universe. The consequences of these choices reverberate backwards and forwards in time. Through such a nightmarish landscape, errors will be corrected and humanity will be revealed.
Great story, great acting, great effects, really great music and a perfect atmosphere make for one of the best films of the year. Go see it; your future self will thank you.
5/5 *'s
For me, it isn't the fact that the future self wasted away in moments that I find frightening; it's that the present self must still live his life - dismembered and broken - for these events to happen.
Time travel as a weapon. Did you really think we'd use it for anything else?
"Looper" may not officially be a horror film, but it features some scary sequences and themes, as good sci fi should. It is mostly set in 2042 Kansas, where it appears that gangland violence and poverty have only gotten worse - at least we finally get hovering motorcycles. We follow Joe, a gangster known as a looper; someone who eliminates targets sent from the mob of the future, to his present. When his newest target - his future self - escapes, Joe gets in trouble with his boss, and must hunt himself to make things right. But, is it as simple as that?
With time travel, nothing is "simple". You see, there's the "12 Monkeys" (time cannot be changed) way of presenting time travel, and the "Back to the Future" (time can be changed, and multiple possibilities exist) method. "Looper" kind of has a variation closer to - believe it or not - "Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure". In that movie, characters will tell themselves to go back in time and grab an object, and BOOM - the object appears in their hand, negating the need to go back in time. While that scenario doesn't play out in our story, similar paradoxical situations are offered. If you're not careful, your egg could fry like a brain.
The arc(s) of Joe (both of them) and how it is presented may be the best aspect of the story. There's a beautiful symmetry of personality happening here, as the two versions of the same man occupy the same space and time, and a wonderful irony when we see how the conflicts change both the present and future selves. A nomination for best screenplay is not out of the question, I say.
If given the opportunity, would you kill child Hitler in order to prevent atrocities? What if you fail, and end up being the reason for the creation of the monster you tried to destroy? Could you live with that? Could you stop that? Can the chain be broken and the loop cut? I thought about this on the ride home after the screening.
It's chaotic, it's dark, and it's what I want out of sci fi. Characters are forced to make impossible choices in an almost impossible to grasp universe. The consequences of these choices reverberate backwards and forwards in time. Through such a nightmarish landscape, errors will be corrected and humanity will be revealed.
Great story, great acting, great effects, really great music and a perfect atmosphere make for one of the best films of the year. Go see it; your future self will thank you.
5/5 *'s
Labels:
12 Monkeys,
2012,
Bruce Willis,
cinema,
Emily Blunt,
film critic,
future,
jeff daniels,
Joseph Gordon-Levitt,
Looper,
movie,
movie review,
movies,
past,
present,
Rian Johnson,
screenplay,
Time travel
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)